The personal network: Main objective
The main objective was to
identify the networks that reflected the socially active relationships
of the elderly respondents in the core and the outer layers of the larger
network. In choosing a method to identify the personal networks, several
criteria were set regarding who was to be included in the network. First,
the network composition had to be as varied as possible, implying that
every type of relationship deserved the same chance to be included in the
network. This criterion led to a domain-specific approach in the network
identification, using seven formal types of relationships (see below).
A second objective was to include all the network members the elderly respondents
had regular contact with, thus identifying their socially active relationships.
However, the aim was not to include everybody they had contact with. To
avoid including people they had regular contact with by definition (such
as all their colleagues and all the other members of their bridge club),
the criterion of the importance of the relationship was added. The respondents
could only nominate the network members who they had regular contact with
and who were important to them. This enabled them, for example, to nominate
the two colleagues they had relatively close contact with and leave the
others out of the network. This domain-contact procedure (Van Tilburg,
1995) is an adaptation of the one developed by Cochran et al. (1990).
Seven domains of network
members are identified. In addition, respondents could identify 'forgotten'
contacts. The maximum number to be identified is 80. Per domain there is
also a maximum, specified as follows:
- household members, including
the partner: 12
- children and their partners:
25 minus the number of network members identified earlier
- other family members:
40 minus the number of network members identified earlier
- neighbors: 50 minus the
number of network members identified earlier
- contacts through work
and school: 60 minus the number of network members identified earlier
- members of organizations:
70 minus the number of network members identified earlier
- others: 80 minus the number
of network members identified earlier
- "forgotten" contacts:
80 minus the number of network members identified earlier
Thus, when fewer people
in a particular domain are nominated than the maximum allows, this difference
is added to the maximum for the following domain. Only very small number
of respondents reached the maximum set in a specific domain. However, none
nominated the maximum number (80). Therefore, respondents who reached the
maximum in a specific domain had the opportunity to nominate more persons
in the domain of "forgotten" contacts.
For each identified network member and its relationship with th respondent a number of questions were asked.
Updated 28-07-2003
© Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam. Design by Theo van Tilburg